NFL Franchise Class Action
Represented a national football league team in a class action.
Represented a national football league team in a class action.
Represented Donald F. Conway, the Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Trustee, in the sale of 4778 Broadway, in the Inwood section of Manhattan, to affiliates of the Housing Development Partnership Corporation and Maddd Equities, for 12.3 million, which was authorized by the Bankruptcy Court. Herrick provided strategic advice and counsel in marketing the site, analyzing potential zoning issues, environmental issues and transactional services.
Achieved a significant victory in New Jersey federal court on behalf of a pharmaceutical company, securing the dismissal of our client from a putative class action alleging violations of consumer fraud laws in the marketing of product. Finding that the plaintiffs had failed to remedy basic pleading deficiencies in their original complaint, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, the court dismissed the amended complaint with prejudice since “further amendment would be futile.”
Herrick achieved a significant appellate victory on behalf of a leading consumer products manufacturer in litigation with a general contractor and third-party subcontractors over payment for work done on a multimillion dollar building project in New Jersey. In a published opinion ordering a new trial, the New Jersey Appellate Division agreed that “the jury instructions and verdict sheet both misstated the applicable legal principals of contract law,” leading to a verdict in which the contractor was found to have breached its contract with our client yet nonetheless received an award on a services-rendered basis, which only applies in the absence of a binding agreement. The appellate court further found that the trial court’s flawed instructions prevented the jury from considering our client’s counterclaim for damages incurred as a result of the contractor’s defective work.
Negotiated a settlement on behalf of a commercial bank resulting in the voluntary dismissal of all claims filed in a New Jersey state court by an asset manager seeking to hold the bank responsible for losses on a failed loan made to a furniture business prior to the business’ bankruptcy filing. Claiming that it had been induced into extending the loan based, in part, on a multi- million revolving credit line extended to the business by our client, the plaintiff argued that the credit line and our client’s alleged failure to adequately monitor the business gave the plaintiff the impression that the business was is better financial shape than it was. Following Herrick’s filing of a third-party complaint, repeated motions to dismiss and an aggressive discovery, the plaintiff dismissed its claims against our client without any payment or admission of wrongdoing while negotiating settlements from the remaining defendants.
Successful defense of the North American subsidiary of a multinational automotive parts manufacturer in national consumer fraud class actions involving allegations that an innovative tire design was more susceptible to road hazard damage than regular tires. The firm’s successes on behalf of the client include obtaining an important, precedent setting decision from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals that vacated the lower court’s certification of a limited New Jersey sub-class of plaintiffs, and then later securing the dismissal of all but one of the claims asserted in a copycat class action, effectively precluding the plaintiffs from further pursuing the litigation.
Defense of the affiliate of a national energy services provider in a consumer fraud class action filed in Pennsylvania federal court by plaintiffs claiming to have been “locked” into variable rate contracts charging purportedly inflated rates for electricity.
Negotiated a favorable settlement on behalf of a national electricity services provider to resolve a putative class action filed in New Jersey federal court by a plaintiff alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
Representing major manufacturer of commercial and residential roofing in multiple warranty claims.
Herrick secured an appellate victory for the chapter 7 trustee of bankrupt demolition subcontractor Red Rock Services, affirming a judgment of almost $1 million won in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On behalf of the trustee, Herrick sued a general contractor for breach of its obligations under subcontracts with Red Rock in a pair of multimillion dollar construction projects in Baltimore and Boston. After eight days of trial, the trustee was awarded a judgment of almost $1 million, including attorneys' fees. Herrick defended the judgment on appeal to the district court, where it was affirmed, and went on to successfully defend the ruling on the defendant’s second appeal to the Third Circuit, which affirmed the judgments of the bankruptcy court and district court in their entirety.
Representation of a German investment firm with respect to its investment portfolio of U.S. life insurance policies. In addition to providing advice concerning life settlement laws and regulations in various jurisdictions, Herrick has also represented the company in litigation on its disputed claims in multiple jurisdictions. In 2012, Herrick procured a multi-million dollar settlement for the client, almost 90 percent of the policy value, in New Jersey federal litigation in which the carrier contested the claim as a likely STOLI ("stranger originated life insurance") policy. More recently, in 2013, Herrick settled a large claim filed in Pennsylvania federal court in which our client received approximately 70 percent of the policy value in a case where the age of the insured, a former Syrian national, was disputed. Herrick will continue to represent the client on U.S. claims going forward.
Obtained favorable jury verdict and judgment on behalf of a Turkish furniture exporter asserting breach of contract claims in New Jersey federal court against a former business partner and the former head of the client’s U.S. affiliate.
We represent a number of victims of Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme. In January of 2009, we filed notices of claim with the Securities & Exchange Commission alleging negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The SEC rejected our claims six months later, and on Wednesday, October 14, 2009, we filed the historic and first known lawsuit against the SEC seeking monetary damages under the FTCA, Molchatsky and Schneider v. United States. We were lead counsel on the Molchatsky case and filed two additional cases against the United States on behalf of other Madoff victims. While the Second Circuit ultimately dismissed the action, essentially saying that the SEC had absolute immunity, the case sent a message that Herrick will leave no stone unturned on behalf of its clients. The firm continues to defend Madoff victims in clawback actions initiated against them by the Madoff bankruptcy trustee.
Representation of three partners in a 'bet the company' lawsuit brought in New Jersey state court by the fourth partner, who claimed to be an oppressed minority shareholder. Herrick defeated the plaintiff's order to show cause seeking injunctive relief including the appointment of a receiver, and then obtained a dismissal of the lawsuit based on arbitration agreement.
Herrick represented an insurance producer embroiled in an arbitration with a former client over unpaid commissions. The arbitration resulted in a recovery of over $1 million.
Representation of the Trustee for Winstar Communications in an adversarial proceeding asserting claims of insider/voidable preference, equitable subordination and breach of contract, against Lucent Technologies. After winning at the bankruptcy court level following a one month trial and an initial appeal to the US District Court, we successfully argued to the US Third Circuit Court of Appeals in a case then valued at about $340 million. The Third Circuit affirmed the courts below and found that Lucent was an insider of Winstar. In so ruling, the court also upheld the Trustee's arguments regarding earmarking, new value, core versus non-core jurisdiction, right to jury trial and equitable subordination. The American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, in its April 2009 issue, featured the Third Circuit decision and wrote that the case “opens an entirely new and extensive arena in bankruptcy-preference litigation that may cause profound changes in both preference-risk assessments and creditor behavior.”
Representation of an insurer with respect to the regulatory and administrative aspects of its rebate programs, including audit advice as well as representation in disputes with pharmacy benefits managers.
Representation of a finance company in its foreclosure of a commercial property placed in receivership due to the collapse of an alleged Ponzi scheme by the ownership entity.
Representation of the Audit Committee of a New York Stock Exchange listed company to conduct an internal investigation of whistleblower claims brought by a former officer alleging that certain officers and directors had committed accounting fraud and violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Conducted an internal investigation into massive trading losses incurred by a rogue employee of a futures commission merchant, and represented the FCM in connection with investigations into the conduct by the CFTC and CME.
Representation of a national retail brokerage firm in a state court action alleging sales practice violations.
Represented a real estate services company in a $20 million lawsuit brought by former customers. The former customers, owners of two large New York City office buildings, claimed that our client, which managed the buildings, had committed numerous acts of wrongdoing over several years, including breaching contracts, fraud, and breaching fiduciary duties. The customers sought to recover all the fees they’d paid our client over the years under New York’s “faithless servant” doctrine. The District Court granted our summary judgment motion, dismissing all of the higher-damage tort and equity claims, and we then settled the remaining breach of contract claim. The former customers lost their appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, bringing the case to a successful conclusion for our client.
Represented an investor group in connection with fraud and misrepresentation claims against an investment manager in various private investments.
Representation of a solar energy company in connection with an employee's suspected breach of a non-compete agreement and breaches of fiduciary duty. Herrick advised the company on how to terminate the rogue employee and to secure evidence relating to any unfair competition engaged in by a competitor.
A leading futures and options broker in a civil litigation stemming from a $200 million fraud perpetrated by a hedge fund manager.
Representation of a national retail brokerage firm in claims brought by the Enforcement Division of the New York Stock Exchange relating to proxy procedures used on an industry-wide basis. The case was favorably resolved after discovery.
Representation of First Allied Securities in an NASD arbitration in Seattle, Washington involving claims against a competitor for raiding an entire division of the company, including multiple brokers in multiple offices.
Representation of a medical device company in avoiding litigation threatened by a competitor over our client's hiring of several of the competitor's employees.
Representation of a developer in a multiparty litigation involving alleged construction defects resulting from the conversion of a 17-story refrigerated building into a condominium property. Herrick replaced prior counsel, and was able to quickly settle lawsuits that had been pending in both federal and state court in New York for over a year.
Representation of the Trustee for Winstar Communications in its bankruptcy case against Lucent Technologies. Following a three month bench trial, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court awarded the Trustee judgment on its bankruptcy and breach of contract claims against Lucent, finding Lucent to be an insider of Winstar. The Court also found that a $188 million payment made four months before Winstar's bankruptcy was held to be a voidable preference to be repaid by Lucent to Winstar.
Representation of an insurance company in a run off in pursing reinsurance claims against multiple reinsurers and reinsurance pools, both foreign and domestic, including claims in both state and federal courts in New York and New Jersey.