Matters

Real Estate Developers – Breach of Promissory Note and Fraudulent Conveyance Claims

Representing real estate developers in their efforts to pursue damages in excess of $10 million against the estate of a former “asset rich but cash poor” business partner who had defaulted on a short term, multimillion dollar loan - originally guaranteed and later acquired by our clients - for the purpose of co-investing in real estate deals.  In addition to a claim for breach of a promissory note, this litigation includes multiple fraudulent conveyance claims against the executors of the estate as well as a myriad of shell entities we allege were created to receive the estate’s assets - including a large diamond manufacturing businesses and substantial real estate holdings - in an effort to avoid creditors’ claims. 

Challenge to New York State’s Charter School Funding Law

Represented the plaintiffs in Brown v. New York, and initially secured a winning ruling in New York State Supreme Court denying a motion to dismiss our lawsuit challenging New York State's method of funding public charter schools. Our clients, five “representative” families whose children attend charter schools in the state and a Charter School advocacy organization for its member New York charter schools (Northeast Charter Schools Network), argued that New York's practice of providing charter students with as little as three-fifths of what district students receive in the same community, violates the state Constitution and disproportionately affects children of color and lower incomes. While we ultimately lost on appeal, the ruling was particularly important as similar claims raised by charter school parents in four others states – North Carolina, New Jersey, Arizona and Texas – all failed to survive lower court defense motions to dismiss.

All Claims Dismissed in Litigation Challenging $9 Million Sale of Brooklyn Apartment Building

Secured a ruling dismissing all claims against the insured buyers of a Brooklyn apartment building in litigation seeking to strip them of their interests in the property.  The plaintiff launched a multi-pronged attack on the $9 million sale of the building, claiming the transaction had violated his right of first refusal, that the individual who had signed the deed transferring title to the property lacked capacity, and that the deed itself was a forgery.  In its ruling, a New York state court granted our motion to dismiss in its entirety and cancelled the notice of pendency.

Successful Defense of Foreclosure Action Challenged on the Eve of Scheduled Sale

Successfully represented the holder of a first priority mortgage secured by a West Harlem property insured by our title insurance client in an order to show cause proceeding initiated by parties claiming to be the debtor's custodians and seeking to challenge a fully litigated foreclosure action on the eve of the foreclosure sale. The court denied in its entirety the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the debtor’s default and vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale.

Private Equity Credit Investing Arm – Disability Insurance Dispute

Representing the credit investing arm of a publicly traded private equity firm, with $19 billion under management, in a dispute with insurers over payment of disability benefits under a multimillion dollar "key man" policy insuring our client's former co-chief executive officer.

Red Rock Services Trustee – Appellate Victory in Bankruptcy Litigation

Herrick secured an appellate victory for the chapter 7 trustee of bankrupt demolition subcontractor Red Rock Services, affirming a judgment of almost $1 million won in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On behalf of the trustee, Herrick sued a general contractor for breach of its obligations under subcontracts with Red Rock in a pair of multimillion dollar construction projects in Baltimore and Boston. After eight days of trial, the trustee was awarded a judgment of almost $1 million, including attorneys' fees. Herrick defended the judgment on appeal to the district court, where it was affirmed, and went on to successfully defend the ruling on the defendant’s second appeal to the Third Circuit, which affirmed the judgments of the bankruptcy court and district court in their entirety.

Turkish Exporter – Favorable Jury Verdict and Judgment in Breach of Contract Litigation

Obtained favorable jury verdict and judgment on behalf of a Turkish furniture exporter asserting breach of contract claims in New Jersey federal court against a former business partner and the former head of the client’s U.S. affiliate.

New Jersey Doctor – Health Care Anti-Kickback Prosecution

Representation of a doctor charged by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey with violating the federal Medicare/Medicaid anti-kickback statute for allegedly receiving improper referral fees for sending patients to a particular MRI/CT Scan service provider.