Negotiated Settlement Resolving Construction Defect Dispute with Luxury Residential Tower’s Board

Represented the sponsor of a luxury Manhattan residential condominium tower in assessing and resolving damage claims asserted by the building’s board of managers in connection with alleged construction defects, violations of construction specifications, failure to comply with the offering plan, and breaches of various warranties. Negotiated a favorable settlement that resolved the dispute amicably and avoided potentially disruptive and costly litigation.

Multinational Cosmetics Company – Favorable Resolution to Breach of Contract Action

Represented a multinational cosmetics company in litigation filed in New York federal court by a Washington, DC area retailer asserting breach of contract, detrimental reliance, and tortuous interference claims, which sought monetary damages and a preliminary injunction preventing our client from violating a retailer agreement that allegedly required it to supply cosmetic products to the plaintiff. After obtaining an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, Herrick negotiated a settlement on favorable terms that resolved the litigation.

Defense of Consolidated Personal Injury Actions from Passenger Van Rollover

Representing a leading tire manufacturer in multiple personal injury and wrongful death actions consolidated in Bronx Supreme Court. The actions seek damages from our client and other defendants in connection with a rollover accident involving a 15-passenger transport vehicle.

Pharmaceutical Company – Dismissal from Consumer Fraud Class Action

Herrick secured a significant win for a pharmaceutical company in a New Jersey federal court ruling dismissing our client from a putative class action for failure to state a claim. The wide-ranging lawsuit involved allegations concerning alleged violations of consumer fraud laws in the marketing of product.

Outdoor Advertising Company – Preliminary Injunction Secured in Dispute over Times Square Billboard Lease

Represented a major outdoor advertising billboard company in seeking a permanent injunction to prevent the termination of a valuable lease for an iconic LED billboard space in the heart of Times Square. Following the landlord’s refusal to honor our client’s right to exercise a 10-year renewal option in the lease, Herrick secured a temporary restraining order preventing the defendants from taking steps to terminate or otherwise interfere with our client’s possession of the space. When negotiations failed to resolve the differences between the parties, Herrick successfully argued for a preliminary injunction pending a determination on the merits. In the wake of these successes, and on the eve of arguments on our motion for summary judgment, Herrick was able to negotiate a very favorable settlement that allowed our client to renew the lease and maintain its possession of the billboard space.

Real Estate Developers – Summary Judgment in Litigation over Recourse Provision in Mezzanine Loan Guaranty

Defense of the guarantors of a multimillion dollar mezzanine loan secured for the development of several Florida condominium projects in an action filed by the lender in New York federal court. Seeking the full outstanding balance of the loan with interest, an amount totaling nearly $190 million, the lender claimed that certain transfers out of an escrow account holding condominium purchasers’ deposits triggered a full recourse provision in the guaranty. Herrick successfully argued that the full recourse provision of the guaranty was never triggered, obtaining a ruling granting our motion for summary judgment and dismissing all claims against our clients.

Affordable Housing Developer – Resolution of Breach of Contract Claims against NYCHA

Negotiated a favorable settlement on behalf of a national developer of affordable housing, resolving a breach of contract litigation against the New York City Housing Authority related to a high-profile and long-stalled project to redevelop a large New York City public housing complex.

Multiple Claims Dismissed in Shareholder Derivative Litigation

Secured a ruling in Kings County Supreme Court on behalf of a garment manufacturer and certain affiliated individuals and entities that dismissed several causes of action in a purported shareholder derivative suit. Among the claims asserted was the allegation that a competing entity had been used by certain defendants to usurp business opportunities, and that ownership of a company facility had been fraudulently transferred to a charitable trust and foundation. The court granted our motion to dismiss the claim for a constructive trust over either the alleged competing entity or the foundation; an unjust enrichment claim against the charitable trust and foundation defendants; and a claim of rescission of the alleged fraudulent transfer of the facility, which the court found was time-barred.

Appellate Division Reverses Civil Penalty against Landlord over ADA Accommodations

Herrick achieved a significant appellate victory on behalf of a national real estate development and management firm, securing a ruling from the Appellate Division, Second Department that reversed a New York City Commission on Human Rights order requiring the client to pay a $185,000 fine for denying a tenant's request to construct a handicapped-accessible entrance to her Queens apartment. In its ruling, the court wrote that the record lacked "substantial evidence" to contradict our client’s claim that installing an accessible entrance was not structurally feasible. The decision was the culmination of a nearly 6-year-long dispute in which we initially prevailed on the client’s behalf before an administrative law judge who held that the proposed accommodation sought by the tenant was not reasonable. The Commission, however, summarily rejected the ruling, and awarded $200,000 in damages and penalties. A Queens Supreme Court affirmed the agency’s decision but reduced the award of damages. On appeal, and after oral argument, the Second Department reversed the trial court’s decision, holding that the Commission’s determination of unlawful discrimination and award of damages should have been annulled in its entirety.

Real Estate Management Company – Precedent Setting Decision in Wage & Hour Action

Successful defense of a real estate management company and its principal sued by a former residential janitor and two alleged former laborers at New York City properties managed by our client. The plaintiffs claimed minimum wage and overtime violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law, as well as related common law claims. The court granted, in substantial part, our motion to dismiss, striking 9 of the plaintiffs’ 12 claims in one of the first decisions to interpret the minimum wage and overtime provisions under New York law and the Minimum Wage Order for the Building Service Industry as they relate to residential janitors.

Appellate Victory Dismissing Former Employer’s Claims against Asset Management Executive

Herrick secured a complete appellate victory in its defense of a hedge fund industry veteran against claims asserted by an asset management firm, where the client had formerly been employed as joint CEO. In its ruling, the Appellate Division, First Department unanimously reversed, with costs, the trial court’s order denying our motion to dismiss the complaint. In its opinion, the appellate court agreed that the plaintiff’s breach of contract, promissory estoppel and unjust enrichment claims, arising from an alleged oral agreement, were time-barred.

New York Court of Appeals Victory for Capital One N.A.

Won an important victory before the New York Court of Appeals on behalf of a major national bank regarding the shortening of the limitations period contained in New York’s UCC 4-406 which governs a bank customer's duty to discover and report unauthorized signatures or alterations. In a significant decision for the banking industry, the Court of Appeals held that two financially sophisticated parties can modify UCC 4-406’s statutory one-year period for reporting unauthorized activity to 14 days, the time frame provided for in the bank documents between the parties. Herrick represented Capital One through every stage of the dispute, obtaining dismissal of the customer’s complaint at the trial court which awarded summary judgment to Capital One on all of its counterclaims.

Multinational Food & Beverage Company – Successful Defense in New Jersey Franchise Practices Litigation

Successfully defended the U.S. affiliate of a multinational food & beverage company sued in New Jersey federal court by a distributor alleging violation of the state's Franchise Practices Act. In both the district court and on appeal to the Third Circuit, Herrick delivered key victories in opposing the plaintiff's efforts to secure an injunction preventing our client from effecting its contractual right not to renew an exclusive distribution agreement between the parties. In the district court, we obtained rulings partially dismissing the complaint, denying plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, and denying plaintiff's motion for an injunction pending its appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Following expedited briefing, the appellate court found in our client's favor, affirming the district court's rulings. In light of these developments, the parties ultimately reached a settlement and stipulated to the dismissal of this litigation.

DataTreasury Corp. – $100 Million Dispute with Former COO

Successful defense of DataTreasury Corp. in a 41-day bench trial arising from claims by the company's former Chief Operating Officer that he was entitled to exercise certain stock options granted to him during his tenure. We helped obtain a decision dismissing all of the former executive's claims based on his disloyal conduct in trying to usurp business opportunities coupled with his failure to properly exercise the options, and defeated the plaintiff's multiple post-trial motions.

Taxi Medallion Financing Company – $27.5 Million Judgment

Represented a large specialty financing company in enforcing a series of agreements that provided the company with an interest in the appreciation of the underlying collateral. Following extensive briefing on a summary judgment motion, the court rejected defenses based on usury and the Small Business Investment Act and issued a $27.5 million judgment in favor of our client.

Google Inc. – NJ Appellate Division Affirms Summary Judgment

Represented Google Inc. before the NJ Appellate Division, which affirmed summary judgment granted by the New Jersey Superior Court in favor of Google, dismissing claims by an online merchant for breach of contract and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The appellate court upheld the terms and enforceability of Google’s online merchant "click-wrap" agreement, including its liability limitations, while rejecting plaintiff’s claim that it was an unenforceable contract of adhesion. D’Agostino v. Appliances by Phone, Inc., et al., 2016 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 504 (Mar. 8, 2016).

Apparel Manufacturer – Successful Defense in Breach of Contract and Unpaid Compensation Action – Successful Prosecution of Breach of Contract Claims

Successful defense of a leading manufacturer of coats and outerwear in a dispute related to the acquisition of the assets of a business, and an employment agreement between our client and the business's former owner. The court dismissed plaintiffs' complaint, which asserted claims for breach of the asset purchase agreement and employment agreement, and granted our client's counterclaims for breach of those same agreements. Following the trial court's determination of liability in our client's favor, we reached a favorable settlement regarding damages to our client.

Aircraft Retrofitter – Litigation in Connection with Aircraft Sale

Defense of an aircraft retrofitter in litigation filed in New York federal court alleging that the company conspired with a multinational aerospace and transportation company, named as a co-defendant, to sell a nearly $22 million jet to the plaintiff by falsely claiming the aircraft could be modified to fly internationally. Claims include fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent inducement.

Ukrainian Technology Services Company – Breached Master Service Agreement

Herrick secured an extremely favorable settlement on behalf of a Ukraine-based technology service provider, resolving its claims against a US-based multinational financial services company in connection with more than $6 million in software development services rendered by our client. Significantly, this settlement was accomplished without engaging in potentially extensive and costly litigation.

Menswear Designer and Manufacturer – Licensing Agreement Dispute

Represented a formal menswear designer and manufacturer as defendant and third-party plaintiff in a dispute over alleged material omissions made during negotiations to renew a licensing agreement for several well-known clothing brands.

Borrower – Negotiated Settlement to Resolve Dispute with Guarantor

Negotiated a favorable settlement on behalf of a borrower to resolve litigation initiated by a guarantor seeking to recover damages arising from our client’s alleged default on loans totaling over $7 million.

Investment Bank – Alleged Breach of Exclusive Agency Agreement

Representing a New York-based investment bank in litigation with a German oil and gas company alleged to have breached an exclusive agency agreement in connection with a $325 million capital raise.

Challenge to New York State’s Charter School Funding Law

Herrick achieved an important victory on behalf of the plaintiffs in Brown v. New York, securing a ruling in New York State Court denying a motion to dismiss our lawsuit challenging New York State's method of funding public charter schools. Our clients, five families whose children attend charter schools in the state and a Charter School advocacy organization for its member New York charter schools, argue that New York's practice of providing charter students with as little as three-fifths of what district students receive in the same community, violates the state Constitution and disproportionately affects children of color and lower incomes. The ruling was particularly important as similar claims raised by charter school parents in four others states – North Carolina, New Jersey, Arizona and Texas – all failed to survive defense motions to dismiss. Herrick continues to represent the clients in defending the ruling on appeal to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

Investment Fund – Breach of Participation Agreement Dispute

Herrick negotiated a very favorable settlement on behalf of an alternative investment fund in a breach of contract suit arising from a transaction in which our client acquired a 10 percent participation in a loan to a mining company. We sued in New York state court after realizing that a significant portion of the collateral securing the loan had been disposed of without our client receiving its pro rata share of the proceeds as required under the participation agreement. Herrick was able to negotiate a substantial settlement for the client that avoided the need for protracted litigation.

Counsel and Law Firm – Successful Appeal of Contempt of Court Ruling

Secured a favorable ruling from the Second Circuit on behalf of attorneys and their law firm in their appeal of a district court’s ruling holding them in contempt of court and sanctioning them for the alleged failure of their clients, the Republic of Iraq and Iraq's Ministry of Industry, to comply with a post-judgment discovery order.  Finding that our clients had been given insufficient notice of the charges, and that the district court exceeded the bounds of its discretion when, under the circumstances, it proceeded to sua sponte find the attorney appellants in contempt, the Second Circuit vacated the order of contempt against our clients.  In vacating the contempt finding, the Second Circuit also ruled that the attorneys had appellate jurisdiction even after the underlying case against their clients had settled and the judgment satisfied, a previously open question of law in this Circuit.

Major League Sports Team – Dismissal of False Advertising Class Action

Successful defense of a major league professional sports team, obtaining pre-motion dismissal of all claims in a high-profile putative class action alleging deceptive trade practices and false advertising in connection with a very large sale of memorabilia.

Business Dispute – Proposed Solar Farm Joint Venture

Successfully defended a New Jersey-based real estate company in litigation filed in New York state court by a potential joint venture partner in the development of New Jersey solar farm installations. When the venture never materialized, the plaintiff filed suit asserting breach of contract and tort claims, and seeking over $10 million in damages. Herrick obtained a dismissal of all claims against the client in the trial court, and won affirmation of the dismissal from the Appellate Division, First Department.

Global Food Manufacturer – Breach of Contract Dispute with Equipment Supplier

Represented a global food manufacturer in a dispute with an equipment supplier and its parts manufacturers over the defendants' failure to deliver a complete packaging line pursuant to the terms of a written contract. Litigation includes claims for breach of contract, fraud and negligent misrepresentation.

Aviation Services Company – Breach of Contract and Unjust Enrichment Claims

Negotiated a favorable settlement on behalf of an aviation services company to resolve breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims filed in New York federal court in connection with a business venture to purchase and modify a large commercial aircraft for a planned sale to a third-party for use as an executive business jet.

Major League Baseball Franchise – Contract Dispute

Obtained summary judgment, including dismissal of all claims and recovery on counterclaim for breach of contract, on the district court level on behalf a Major League Baseball franchise in a contract dispute involving advertising and sponsorship rights, and protected judgment on appeal to the Second Circuit.

Lelands – NFL Championship Ring

Represented Lelands in litigation filed in New York federal court by former NFL player Jim Brown regarding the recovery of a 1964 NFL championship ring alleged to have been stolen.

Former Owners of Acquired Business – Litigation to Recoup Monies Held in Escrow

Representing the former owners of a designer and distributor of mechanical and chemical fastening products acquired by a Fortune 500 manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware in litigation to recoup monies held in an escrow account as indemnification payments for post-closing risks. Dispute involves issues related to import tariff and customs duties imposed by Canadian authorities on products imported by the acquired business from the Republic of China.

Successful Challenge to Arbitration Award in $42 Million Dispute

Herrick successfully argued for the overturning of an arbitration award in a $42 million dispute over the proper distribution of an estate - an especially notable win for our client as arbitration awards are so difficult to vacate. Based on the arbitrator's violation of a little-known New York state law that invalidates arbitration proceedings held on a Sunday, the court ruled that the arbitration proceedings and award were void, and also found that the arbitrator had exceeded the scope of its power when it imposed a legal fee penalizing any party challenging the award when the parties had never agreed to such a provision. Additionally, the court found that the award involved distribution of estate assets which can only be distributed by the Surrogate's Court.

Commercial Lenders – Defense of Conversion, Unjust Enrichment and Fraud Claims

Defense of commercial lenders in litigation filed in New York state court by a former employee alleging our clients wrongfully retained certain funds belonging to the plaintiff. This action, which involves related litigation filed in China and Singapore, includes claims for fraud, conversion, conspiracy to commit fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of article 4 of the UCC Code. We currently are awaiting a ruling on our December 2014 motion to dismiss, in which we argue that the lawsuit is time barred and fails to state a cause of action.

Manufacturer – Summary Judgment in Breach of Contract Action

Successfully represented a Queens, NY-based packaging manufacturer, obtaining summary judgment in a New York state court breach of contract action against a former customer who failed to pay for goods ordered and received.

International Diamond Grading Network – All Claims Dismissed in Trademark/Unfair Competition Dispute

Following a 7-day trial in New York federal court, Herrick obtained a ruling dismissing all claims against our clients, an international diamond grading network and related individuals, in a hotly-contested trademark and unfair competition dispute in which the opposing party sought damages totaling nearly $140 million, as well as draconian and sweeping permanent injunctive relief, under the Lanham Act. Herrick delivered a ruling to our clients that removed the threat of a devastating damages award and judicial injunction, as well as any liability for the opposing party's attorneys' fees.

Entrepreneur / Investor – Successful Prosecution of Fraudulent Transfer Actions

Herrick secured over $2 million in restitution for a prominent attorney/investor in multiple actions filed in New York State court to collect on a multimillion judgment obtained by our client in Delaware Chancery Court. The debtors had rendered themselves insolvent prior to the Chancery Court judgment by selling substantially all of their assets and distributing the proceeds to shareholders.  In the first action filed, Herrick successfully argued that our client had a superior right to the shareholder distributions. The decision was confirmed on appeal, and the remaining actions were quickly settled.

Global Automotive Manufacturer – Dismissal of All Claims in Product Liability Litigation

Herrick successfully defended the North American operations of a global automotive manufacturing company in product liability litigation involving claims based upon implied and express warranties, strict liability and negligence, all premised upon alleged property damage to a vehicle and consequential damages to a construction business caused by allegedly defective tires. The court dismissed all claims against our client, finding that the causes of action were barred under the economic loss doctrine.

Building Materials Manufacturer – Product Liability Disputes

Representing major manufacturer of commercial and residential roofing in multiple warranty claims.

New York Attorney – Successful Defense of Malpractice Claims

Successful defense of a prominent New York City attorney against malpractice claims related to the plaintiff's participation in a written agreement to provide for the funding of loans in the New York City taxicab industry. This dispute had progressed to a jury trial when the parties entered into a settlement in which the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the action and agreed to pay all trial costs.

$25 Million Jury Award – Retrial of Guaranty Case

Won a $25 million jury award in the retrial of a claim originally dismissed by the district court after trial but prior to going to the jury, then reinstated on appeal. The client, an entrepreneur and investor, brought in Herrick to retry the issue of whether the defendant's guaranties on loans made to certain fraudulent and judgment proof entities were enforceable. The jury agreed with our position that the guaranties were enforceable and awarded our client $25 million in damages.

Global Manufacturer of Building Products – Product Liability Litigation

Represented a global manufacturer of building products in litigation filed by an insurer, as subrogee of the purchaser of two roof systems. Plaintiff asserted claims for negligence, strict products liability and breach of express warranty relating to the alleged failure of those systems in a high wind event. Action was settled and dismissed on terms very favorable to our client.

Title Insurance Company – Class Action Defense

Representation of a title insurance company in a class action alleging overcharges on premiums for policies sold to consumers in New Jersey. We settled—on terms favorable to our client—early enough in negotiations to minimize our client's legal fees.  

Dismissal of Claims – International Council of Museums

Representation of the International Council of Museums in successfully obtaining the dismissal of claims brought in the US District Court (Southern District of NY), by a Canadian art verification expert for allegedly defamatory content re-posted on the Council's online public blog site that was operated out of France.

Surrogate’s Court Litigation – Allegations of Trustees’ Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Represented co-trustees of two trusts whose primary assets are stock in a family-owned national food manufacturing company in litigation filed in Nassau County Surrogate's Court. Dispute involves allegations that our clients, in their actions as officers and board directors of the company, breached their fiduciary duties to the trusts' beneficiaries. This litigation involves parallel litigation in state court in which our firm is representing the company.

Rent Stabilization Association of NYC – Litigation in New York State Supreme Court

Representation of the Rent Stabilization Association of NYC, the largest trade association in New York City dedicated to protecting and serving the interests of the residential housing industry, in litigation filed in New York state Supreme Court challenging the legitimacy of the state's Tenant Protection Unit and a set of new rent regulations that violate rent regulated owners' rights.

Judgment Debtor – Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation

Representation of judgment debtor defending multiple actions under Debtor and Creditor Law in New York State Supreme Court.

Trucking Company – Contract Termination/TRO

Representation of Trucking Company in contract termination litigation in U.S. District Court with contract partner/wholesaler attempting to terminate for breach of contract. After hearing, obtained a preliminary injunction preventing termination.

Construction Management Company – Wrongful Termination

Representation of a construction management company in a dispute with NYU Hospitals Center regarding the termination of a multi-million dollar renovation contract. After a trial in Federal Bankruptcy Court, the court held in favor of our client on all counts, entitling them to payment of its outstanding requisitions and dismissal of all claims against them.

REIT – Office Building Settlement

Representation of a major, publicly-owned REIT in obtaining a favorable settlement in a multi-million dollar litigation related to cleaning and maintenance services at four large office buildings in New York City.