%PDF-1.4
%
1 0 obj
<<
/Type /Catalog
/Metadata 2 0 R
/Pages 3 0 R
>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/Creator (eCopy, Inc)
/Producer (eCopy, Inc; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT)
/ModDate (D:20140908133754-04'00')
/CreationDate (09-05-2014)
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Type /Metadata
/Subtype /XML
/Length 5 0 R
>>
stream
application/pdf
eCopy, Inc
2014-09-08T13:37:54-04:00
2014-09-05T18:48:25-04:00
2014-09-08T13:37:54-04:00
eCopy, Inc; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT
uuid:23e0862f-fa09-46ca-8f7c-4dde517f0fb3
uuid:dca618f2-bdf7-42ab-8afb-0ce28e86c72f
endstream
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/ITXT (2.1.7)
/Type /Pages
/Count 9
/Kids [6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R 12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R]
>>
endobj
5 0 obj
3269
endobj
6 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 18 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
7 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 22 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 611.0399780273 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 26 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 611.5200195312 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 30 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 34 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 611.0399780273 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
11 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 38 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 42 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 46 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 50 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 611.2800292969 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<<
/Length 51 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<<
/Length 52 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.00 0.00 0.00 792.00 0.00 0.00 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im7 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F8 11.86 Tf
100 Tz
73.20 712.08 TD
(Max Folkenflik, Esq.) Tj
/F8 12.77 Tf
0.00 -14.16 TD
(FOLKENFLIK & McGERITY LLP) Tj
/F9 10.90 Tf
-.96 -13.44 TD
(Attorneys for Defendant Fastenberg) Tj
/F8 11.70 Tf
1.92 -13.92 TD
(1500 Broadway) Tj
/F8 10.99 Tf
-1.20 -13.68 TD
(215t Floor) Tj
/F8 11.92 Tf
-.48 -13.92 TD
(New York, New York 10036) Tj
/F8 11.79 Tf
0.72 -16.08 TD
(\(212\) 757-0400) Tj
/F8 12.02 Tf
-.24 -11.52 TD
(mfolkenflik\(fmlaw.net) Tj
/F8 11.89 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT) Tj
/F8 11.87 Tf
0.48 -13.92 TD
(SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK) Tj
/F9 11.49 Tf
-.48 -27.84 TD
(BEACON ASSOCIATES LLC I, BEACON) Tj
/F8 11.91 Tf
-.24 -13.92 TD
(ASSOCIATES LLC II, ANDOVER ASSOCIATES,) Tj
/F8 11.93 Tf
0.24 -13.68 TD
(L.P., ANDOVER ASSOCIATES LLC I, ANDOVER) Tj
/F9 11.32 Tf
-.24 -13.68 TD
(ASSOCIATES \(QP\) LLC,) Tj
/F8 11.90 Tf
341.76 13.44 TD
(14-CIV-2294) Tj
/F8 11.59 Tf
-242.64 -41.04 TD
(Plaintiffs) Tj
/F8 12.50 Tf
198.72 13.44 TD
(REPLY DECLARATION OF) Tj
/F10 13.06 Tf
20.64 -13.92 TD
(MAX FOLKENFLIK) Tj
/F8 11.58 Tf
-240.48 -27.12 TD
(-vs-) Tj
/F8 11.89 Tf
-77.76 -27.84 TD
(BEACON ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT CORP.,) Tj
/F8 11.91 Tf
-.24 -13.68 TD
(ANDOVER ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT CORP.,) Tj
/F8 11.89 Tf
0.00 -13.92 TD
(INCOME PLUS INVESTMENT FUND, DAVID) Tj
/F8 11.73 Tf
0.00 -13.68 TD
(F ASTENBERG, TRUSTEE, LONG ISLAND) Tj
/F8 11.71 Tf
0.00 -13.92 TD
(VITREO-RETINAL CONSULTANTS 4-o1K FBO) Tj
/F8 11.59 Tf
0.00 -13.68 TD
(DAVID F ASTENBERG,) Tj
/F8 11.64 Tf
95.76 -27.60 TD
(Defendants.) Tj
/F8 12.16 Tf
-59.76 -55.68 TD
(I, Max Folkenflik, hereby declare:) Tj
/F10 5.00 Tf
0.96 -27.60 TD
(1. As the Court is aware, I am a member of ) Tj
/F8 12.13 Tf
237.36 -.24 TD
(Folkenflik & McGerity LLP, counsel) Tj
/F8 12.26 Tf
-274.32 -27.36 TD
(for Defendant David Fastenberg \("Fastenberg"\), and I make this Reply Declaration in Further) Tj
/F10 5.00 Tf
0.24 -27.84 TD
(Support of ) Tj
/F8 12.22 Tf
55.20 0.24 TD
(Fastenberg's motion, by Order to Show Cause, for a declaratory judgment and) Tj
/F10 5.00 Tf
-55.68 -27.60 TD
(mandatory injunction, and in reply to the papers of ) Tj
/F9 11.00 Tf
252.48 -.24 TD
(the Income Plus Investment Fund) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<<
/Length 53 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x%0WBakӅJ-hDA$cnfAM)1gO2drЎ*WA:boگa7pϘ7֒4-oq7:*Ng
endstream
endobj
18 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/XObject 54 0 R
/Font 55 0 R
>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<<
/Length 56 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
20 0 obj
<<
/Length 57 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
611.04 0.00 0.00 792.00 0.00 0.00 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im14 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F15 12.30 Tf
100 Tz
72.72 709.92 TD
(\("Income Plus"\) which seek an order requiring all distributions to investors in the Beacon) Tj
/F15 12.32 Tf
-.24 -25.20 TD
(Fundsl to be computed using the "Valuation Method.") Tj
/F16 11.80 Tf
36.00 -27.60 TD
(2. The Valuation Method calculates the proportional share of each investor in the) Tj
/F17 5.00 Tf
-36.24 -27.60 TD
(net asset value of ) Tj
/F15 12.26 Tf
88.56 0.00 TD
(the Funds, which is calculated by adding contributions made and pro rata) Tj
-88.32 -27.84 TD
(share of reported profits \(including fictitious Madoff profits\) and deducting withdrawals) Tj
/F16 10.97 Tf
-.48 -27.36 TD
(taken and pro rata share of reported losses. Income Plus argues that the Operating) Tj
/F15 12.27 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Agreement for the Beacon Funds provides for distribution to investors to be made on the) Tj
/F17 5.00 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(basis of ) Tj
/F15 12.35 Tf
41.28 0.00 TD
(the Valuation Method. We do not quarrel with that assertion, and made the same) Tj
/F17 5.00 Tf
-41.28 -27.60 TD
(argument in the prior proceedings with respect to the distribution of ) Tj
/F15 5.00 Tf
336.72 -.24 TD
(Non-Madoff ) Tj
/F17 9.68 Tf
64.08 -.24 TD
(money. The) Tj
/F15 12.13 Tf
-400.56 -27.12 TD
(Court agreed.) Tj
/F17 5.00 Tf
35.76 -27.60 TD
(3. We believe, however, that neither the force of ) Tj
/F16 11.06 Tf
264.24 -.24 TD
(the Operating Agreement by) Tj
/F15 5.00 Tf
-300.24 -27.36 TD
(itself ) Tj
/F17 5.00 Tf
27.60 0.00 TD
(nor the fact of ) Tj
/F15 12.25 Tf
72.96 0.00 TD
(this Court's prior decision require the Court to apply the Valuation) Tj
/F15 12.43 Tf
-100.80 -27.60 TD
(Method to the distribution of Madoff money as Income Plus argues. We do not agree that it) Tj
/F15 12.31 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(would be "unfair" to use the Net Investment Method for computing the distribution of) Tj
/F17 5.00 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(MadoffMoney. Use of ) Tj
/F15 12.26 Tf
115.92 0.00 TD
(the Valuation Method for those distributions avoids, rather than) Tj
/F15 12.19 Tf
-115.92 -27.60 TD
(imposes, inequity.) Tj
/F15 12.95 Tf
17.76 -27.84 TD
(The Proper Method of Distribution of Madoff Money Was Not Litigated And Has) Tj
/F16 11.45 Tf
0.00 -13.92 TD
(N ot Yet Been Determined) Tj
/F16 11.81 Tf
18.00 -13.44 TD
(4. Income Plus makes three points. First, Income Plus argues that the doctrine of) Tj
/F15 12.29 Tf
-36.00 -27.60 TD
(collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, applies and requires the application of the Valuation) Tj
/F15 12.33 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(Method to the distribution of Madoff money. As Income Plus concedes, however,) Tj
/F15 12.27 Tf
0.24 -27.84 TD
(application of collateral estoppel requires that the issue decided in the prior proceeding be) Tj
/F15 9.90 Tf
0.48 -54.96 TD
(i The Plaintiffs, Beacon Associates LLC I, Beacon Associates LLC II, Andover Associates L.P., Andover) Tj
/F15 9.93 Tf
-.96 -16.08 TD
(Associates LLC I, and Andover Associates LLC \(QP\) are hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Beacon Funds") Tj
/F15 10.01 Tf
0.24 -11.52 TD
(or the "Funds".) Tj
/F15 10.56 Tf
229.68 -13.20 TD
(2) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<<
/Length 58 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x%Ȼ@~R;3YXA2-`DT4Έ<;^
kI_ź
ׯHpױjn{.3:tG+/acٍF f
endstream
endobj
22 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/XObject 59 0 R
/Font 60 0 R
>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<<
/Length 61 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<<
/Length 62 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
611.52 0.00 0.00 792.00 0.00 0.00 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im21 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F22 12.32 Tf
100 Tz
73.92 712.56 TD
("identical" to the issue to be decided in the current proceeding, and despite the efforts of) Tj
/F22 12.24 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(Income Plus to make it seem otherwise, the issues are entirely different.) Tj
/F23 9.03 Tf
35.76 -27.84 TD
(5. The last proceeding was clearly directed only to Non-Madoffmoney, the cash) Tj
/F22 12.33 Tf
-36.00 -27.60 TD
(remaining in the Beacon Funds which the Beacon Funds sought to distribute. I had been) Tj
/F22 12.22 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(meeting and arguing for many months with Beacon Management's counsel that they had to) Tj
/F22 12.28 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(distribute those proceeds-- investors were desperate to get some of their money out of) Tj
/F22 12.26 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Beacon. Ultimately, Beacon Management commenced Beacon Associates Management) Tj
/F22 12.16 Tf
0.24 -27.60 TD
(Corp. v. Beacon Associates LLC I, No. 09-Civ.-6910, to resolve uncertainty regarding how to) Tj
/F22 12.37 Tf
-.48 -27.36 TD
(make that distribution. There was no effort to resolve any future disputes about future) Tj
0.24 -27.84 TD
(distributions. In particular, there was no attempt to address any future potential recovery of) Tj
/F22 12.59 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(money from the Madoff Trustee. In my negotiations with the attorneys for the Beacon) Tj
/F22 12.22 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Funds and Beacon Management, I recall discussing that we needed to keep the issues as) Tj
-.24 -27.60 TD
(narrow as possible to get a quick determination that hopefully would not be appealed.) Tj
/F24 11.76 Tf
35.76 -27.60 TD
(6. Income Plus makes much of the "fact" that the Beacon Funds had filed a claim) Tj
/F22 12.21 Tf
-35.52 -27.60 TD
(in the BLMIS bankruptcy, and argues, therefore, that potential recovery from the BLMIS) Tj
/F22 12.34 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(Estate was an "asset" of Beacon, subject to the arguments in the prior proceeding. However,) Tj
/F22 12.24 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(the Beacon I audited financial statements for 2008, the then-most current audited financial) Tj
/F23 5.00 Tf
0.48 -27.60 TD
(statements, treated the $358,710,309 investment in BLMIS as worth exactly zero. See, ) Tj
/F22 11.52 Tf
429.84 -.24 TD
(2008) Tj
/F22 12.25 Tf
-430.08 -27.36 TD
(Audited Financial Statements \("2008 Statements"\), annexed hereto as Exhibit A, at page 9,) Tj
/F22 12.23 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(footnote 4. The only change in this approach in the years since 2008 has been to recognize) Tj
/F22 12.21 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(money actually received by the Beacon Funds as cash, when received.) Tj
/F23 8.65 Tf
35.76 -27.60 TD
(7. The initial dispute in this Court followed the analysis by Citrin Cooperman &) Tj
/F22 12.23 Tf
-35.52 -27.60 TD
(Company LLP \("Citrin"\) of three alternative methods of distribution to the Valuation Method) Tj
/F22 8.64 Tf
229.20 -40.56 TD
(3) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<<
/Length 63 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x%ȱ0u+զn(:8Ar+B0 QPѓJՑ- +7> tձd/4_EoK ϘodVe%dZĵTAn
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/XObject 64 0 R
/Font 65 0 R
>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<<
/Length 66 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<<
/Length 67 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.00 0.00 0.00 792.00 0.00 0.00 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im28 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F29 5.00 Tf
100 Tz
73.44 712.08 TD
(spelled out in the Operating Agreement. None of ) Tj
/F30 12.31 Tf
245.52 -.24 TD
(those methods focused on any recovery of) Tj
/F30 12.32 Tf
-246.24 -27.36 TD
(money from the BLMIS Estate. The Net Investment alternative was never discussed.) Tj
/F30 12.26 Tf
0.24 -27.60 TD
(Counsel for the Beacon Funds sent a survey to each of the investors in the Beacon Funds in) Tj
/F30 12.28 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(which he provided illustrative computations of their recoveries using each of the four) Tj
/F30 12.35 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(alternative methods and specifying their exact recoveries under each method. The survey) Tj
0.00 -27.60 TD
(focused exclusively on the cash then being considered for distribution. Nothing in the survey) Tj
/F30 12.30 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(indicated that the same results would apply to future recoveries from the BLMIS Estate, if) Tj
/F29 5.00 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(any, and no mention was made of ) Tj
/F31 11.30 Tf
167.76 0.00 TD
(the Net InvestmentlNet Equity Method.) Tj
/F31 11.72 Tf
-131.28 -27.60 TD
(8. The Complaint seeking Declaratory Relief states in Paragraph 2, under the) Tj
/F29 5.00 Tf
-36.96 -27.60 TD
(heading "Nature of ) Tj
97.20 0.00 TD
(the Action": "Declaratory relief ) Tj
/F30 12.20 Tf
159.12 0.00 TD
(has been sought by BAMC \(Beacon) Tj
/F30 12.23 Tf
-256.32 -27.60 TD
(Associates Management Corp.\) in this action, captioned Beacon Associates Management) Tj
/F30 12.02 Tf
0.48 -27.60 TD
(Corp. v. Beacon Associates Management LLC I, Civ. No. 09-CV -691 0, in order to garner the) Tj
/F29 5.00 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(Court's imprimatur so as to resolve the question of ) Tj
/F30 12.26 Tf
252.24 0.00 TD
(the proper valuation methodology for) Tj
/F31 11.22 Tf
-252.48 -27.60 TD
(distribution of each Beacon members' residual capital accounts, comprised of non- Madoff) Tj
/F30 12.18 Tf
0.24 -27.60 TD
(invested monies." Complaint, Exhibit A to Folkenflik Decl. 8/27/14, i 2 \(emphasis) Tj
/F30 12.03 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(supplied\).) Tj
/F29 5.00 Tf
36.00 -27.60 TD
(9. When I filed my papers in support of ) Tj
/F30 12.25 Tf
219.60 0.00 TD
(the Fastenberg Intervenors' motion for) Tj
/F30 12.21 Tf
-256.08 -27.60 TD
(declaratory and mandatory injunctive relief, the Memorandum of Law stated:) Tj
/F30 11.87 Tf
36.24 -27.60 TD
(On December 11, 2008, the date on which Madoff was arrested and confessed to) Tj
/F30 12.30 Tf
-.24 -13.68 TD
(his crimes, it was uncovered that from inception Madoff had been ruing a) Tj
/F30 11.98 Tf
0.00 -13.92 TD
(massive Ponzi scheme. As of the date of this Motion, all or substantially all of the) Tj
/F30 11.87 Tf
0.00 -13.68 TD
(money entrusted by investors to BLMIS has been lost, although hopefully there) Tj
/F30 11.96 Tf
0.00 -13.92 TD
(will be recoveries made in the future. In this motion the Fastenberg Intervenors) Tj
/F29 5.00 Tf
0.00 -13.68 TD
(are seeking to obtain distribution from Beacon I to them of ) Tj
/F30 11.86 Tf
282.72 -.24 TD
(the money currently) Tj
/F30 11.79 Tf
-282.96 -13.68 TD
(held by Beacon I that was not stolen.) Tj
/F30 10.08 Tf
193.44 -68.16 TD
(4) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
<<
/Length 68 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x%;0wԡIW`DKx*y6BA<; R+ɸDXAf5iFlN%||chSu1tCJ~m
endstream
endobj
30 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/XObject 69 0 R
/Font 70 0 R
>>
endobj
31 0 obj
<<
/Length 71 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<<
/Length 72 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
611.04 0.00 0.00 792.00 0.00 0.00 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im35 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F36 5.00 Tf
100 Tz
73.92 712.08 TD
(See, Fastenberg Intervenors' Memorandum of ) Tj
222.48 0.24 TD
(Law in Support of ) Tj
/F37 11.80 Tf
90.00 0.00 TD
(Motion for Judgment, at) Tj
/F36 5.00 Tf
-312.96 -27.60 TD
(2 \(09 Civ. 6910, Docket ) Tj
/F37 11.84 Tf
117.84 0.00 TD
(No. 25\) \(emphasis in the original\).) Tj
/F38 11.58 Tf
-81.12 -27.60 TD
(10. The money in dispute was really in three buckets: the cash available to be) Tj
/F37 12.27 Tf
-36.96 -27.60 TD
(distributed; the amount of the "liquidation reserve"; and the money held in a segregated) Tj
/F37 12.24 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(account pursuant to a standstill agreement between the Beacon Funds and the Trustee \(about) Tj
/F37 12.35 Tf
0.24 -28.08 TD
($20 milion\), to preserve funds subject to the Trustee's "clawback claim" against the Beacon) Tj
/F38 11.01 Tf
-.48 -27.12 TD
(Funds. There were arguments in the papers and at oral argument which may have mentioned) Tj
/F37 12.26 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(the future receipt of "Madoff money," or money from the Trustee, but the money then being) Tj
/F37 12.32 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(referred to was the $20 million in segregated funds. No one was litigating over money which) Tj
/F37 12.20 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(might in the future be recovered from the BLMIS Estate.) Tj
/F36 8.53 Tf
36.96 -27.60 TD
(11. At the oral argument where one investor, and my client, Jeffery Tolkin, argued) Tj
/F37 12.22 Tf
-36.72 -27.60 TD
(for distribution on aN et Investment Method, I argued for the Valuation Method, and) Tj
/F37 12.41 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(emphasized the fact that this was not "Madoffmoney." After the argument, I assured Mr.) Tj
/F36 5.00 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Tolkin that I recognized the different equities presented by the recovery of ) Tj
/F37 5.00 Tf
368.16 0.00 TD
(Madoff ) Tj
/F37 11.95 Tf
39.60 -.24 TD
(money,) Tj
/F37 12.22 Tf
-407.76 -27.36 TD
(and for that reason would likely argue for a Net Investment Method when that issue ultimately) Tj
/F37 12.21 Tf
-.48 -27.60 TD
(presented itself.) Tj
/F38 11.79 Tf
36.96 -27.60 TD
(12. When relief was finally granted by this Court, it held that "\( a\) mandatory) Tj
/F37 12.16 Tf
-36.72 -27.60 TD
(injunction is granted directing Beacon's Management to distribute, by August 31, 2010,) Tj
/F38 11.05 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Beacon's remaining assets \(less certain hold backs\)..." Beacon Assocs. Mgmt. Corp. v.) Tj
/F37 12.42 Tf
-.48 -27.60 TD
(Beacon Assocs. LLC I, 725 F. Supp. 2d 451,469 \(S.D.N.Y. 2010\). Everyone involved) Tj
/F37 12.35 Tf
0.24 -27.60 TD
(considered the phrase "remaining assets" to mean the cash assets then on hand. Any other) Tj
/F37 12.32 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(interpretation would be inconsistent with the August 31, 2010 date. There was no) Tj
/F37 9.12 Tf
229.44 -68.40 TD
(5) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
<<
/Length 73 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x%ȱ0u+ER6 `!K}EG%C^qЎ ; gБ6!x~
;9\* .c|Hdyx8XN5H1u[ST/l
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/XObject 74 0 R
/Font 75 0 R
>>
endobj
35 0 obj
<<
/Length 76 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
<<
/Length 77 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.00 0.00 0.00 792.00 0.00 0.00 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im42 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F43 12.28 Tf
100 Tz
73.68 712.08 TD
(consideration given by the Court to cash assets which might be obtained in the future either) Tj
/F43 12.16 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(from BLMIS or otherwise.) Tj
/F44 8.36 Tf
37.20 -27.60 TD
(13. In short, as a matter of fact there were no claims made other than with respect) Tj
/F43 12.28 Tf
-37.68 -27.60 TD
(to the cash on hand at the Beacon Funds available for distribution, or which could be in the) Tj
/F44 5.00 Tf
0.24 -27.60 TD
(future available for distribution. There was no actual ) Tj
/F43 12.23 Tf
265.68 0.00 TD
(litigation or determination with respect) Tj
/F43 12.25 Tf
-266.16 -27.60 TD
(to the distribution in the future of Madoff Money which might be recovered from the BLMIS) Tj
/F45 10.92 Tf
0.24 -27.60 TD
(Estate or otherwise.) Tj
/F45 12.48 Tf
17.76 -27.84 TD
(Applying the Valuation Method Wil Further Result in Inequitable Distribution of) Tj
/F43 12.75 Tf
0.00 -13.68 TD
(Madoff Money) Tj
/F44 8.96 Tf
19.44 -27.36 TD
(14. Second, Income Plus argues that the Net Investment Method is "unworkable) Tj
/F43 12.33 Tf
-37.20 -27.60 TD
(and unfair," but it does so by disregarding entirely the inequities which would be created if) Tj
/F45 11.39 Tf
-.48 -27.60 TD
(this Court applied the Valuation Method to the Madoff money distribution now at issue. The) Tj
/F43 12.26 Tf
0.24 -27.60 TD
(counsel for the Beacon Funds has distributed calculations and various computations to) Tj
/F44 5.00 Tf
0.00 -27.84 TD
(counsel for Income Plus and me concerning each of ) Tj
/F43 12.41 Tf
258.00 0.00 TD
(the investors' net equity balances and net) Tj
/F43 12.28 Tf
-258.00 -27.36 TD
(asset values in the Beacon Funds.3 Those computations show that using cash in/cash out from) Tj
/F43 12.30 Tf
-.48 -27.84 TD
(the Beacon Funds, there are currently 22 "net winners," those who to date have received back) Tj
/F43 12.40 Tf
0.24 -27.60 TD
(more than they deposited into Beacon. Those 22 investors already have recovered an) Tj
0.00 -27.60 TD
(aggregate of over $13.5 milion in profts. If the Valuation Method were applied to the) Tj
/F43 12.26 Tf
0.00 -27.36 TD
(distribution of Madoff money as Income Plus is proposing, those would receive further) Tj
/F43 12.38 Tf
0.00 -27.84 TD
(distributions of nearly $5 million, giving them a total profit of $18. 5 milion, subsidized by) Tj
/F43 9.88 Tf
0.00 -107.76 TD
(3 Those computations were submitted pursuant to a confidentiality stipulation but they may be submitted to the) Tj
/F43 10.15 Tf
-.24 -16.08 TD
(Cour in camera, or under seal, should the Cour wish.) Tj
/F43 10.08 Tf
230.40 -13.44 TD
(6) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<<
/Length 78 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x%Ƚ0>7P{o-4eS ;,#{~IAM3'{2v$HAtUټoگa7s01=ʢpOWpYKTMczRM?q
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/XObject 79 0 R
/Font 80 0 R
>>
endobj
39 0 obj
<<
/Length 81 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<<
/Length 82 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.00 0.00 0.00 792.00 0.00 0.00 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im49 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F50 12.24 Tf
100 Tz
73.92 712.56 TD
(approximately 212 other Beacon Fund Investors who will continue to have post-distribution) Tj
/F51 10.58 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(aggregate losses in Beacon.4) Tj
/F50 12.75 Tf
36.96 -27.60 TD
(15. There are many other investors, such as Income Plus, who are presently "net) Tj
/F50 12.26 Tf
-36.96 -27.36 TD
(losers," that is, they have not received back from Beacon their full investment in Beacon, but) Tj
/F52 5.00 Tf
-.48 -27.84 TD
(who will, unfairly we believe, receive from Madoffmoney a far greater percentage of ) Tj
/F50 12.05 Tf
423.36 -.48 TD
(their) Tj
/F51 11.11 Tf
-423.12 -27.12 TD
(losses by the use of the Valuation Method than other investors who also have losses. Those) Tj
/F50 12.24 Tf
0.00 -27.36 TD
(investors would receive nearly $6.5 million more in distributions using the Valuation Method) Tj
/F50 12.32 Tf
-.48 -27.84 TD
(than they would using the Net Investment Method. These computations do not include the) Tj
/F50 12.15 Tf
0.24 -27.36 TD
(20 i 3 distribution of approximately $25million comprised of the distribution of the funds) Tj
/F50 12.17 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(previously held back from the 20 i 0 distribution to cover the Trustee's "claw back" claim as) Tj
/F51 11.43 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(well as further recoveries from Non-Madoffinvestment managers. That $25 million was) Tj
/F51 11.32 Tf
0.00 -27.84 TD
(distributed based on the Valuation Methods. The money distributed on the Valuation Method) Tj
/F50 12.19 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(to date substantially exceeds $150 million.) Tj
/F50 12.98 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(The Valuation Method Distributions GiveLong-Term Investors Substantial Benefits) Tj
/F52 8.30 Tf
36.24 -27.60 TD
(16. Third, to the extent that these Valuation Method distributions did not get the) Tj
/F50 12.24 Tf
-36.72 -27.36 TD
(Valuation Method proponents the entirety of their losses back, they got them very close, and) Tj
/F52 5.00 Tf
0.24 -27.60 TD
(far closer than they would have been if ) Tj
/F50 12.23 Tf
193.92 -.24 TD
(the Net Investment Method had been used for all) Tj
/F50 12.33 Tf
-193.92 -27.60 TD
(distributions. The recoveries made from collateral sources were very substantial, and done on) Tj
/F52 5.00 Tf
-.48 -27.60 TD
(the basis of ) Tj
/F50 12.24 Tf
59.28 0.00 TD
(the Net Investment Method, but, significantly, these collateral source recoveries) Tj
/F50 12.23 Tf
-59.04 -27.60 TD
(are not counted to reduce the recoveries from the BLMIS Estate or in calculating Net Equity) Tj
/F50 9.86 Tf
-.24 -59.52 TD
(4 These amounts do not include collateral source recoveries for any investors of any amount, including the) Tj
/F52 5.00 Tf
-.24 -16.08 TD
(recoveries from the Bank of ) Tj
/F50 9.88 Tf
114.00 0.00 TD
(New York settlement which favored all Beacon investors other than the 22.) Tj
/F52 5.00 Tf
-113.76 -6.96 TD
(5 There was an additional $2.8 million distributed in 2013, which was a recovery of ) Tj
/F50 9.83 Tf
333.60 -5.04 TD
(management fees subject to the) Tj
/F50 10.02 Tf
-333.36 -11.04 TD
(class action settlement and distributed by the Net Investment Method in accordance with the Cour-Approved) Tj
/F50 9.69 Tf
0.00 -11.52 TD
(settlement.) Tj
/F50 9.12 Tf
229.68 -13.44 TD
(7) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
41 0 obj
<<
/Length 83 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x%;0wԡV W`DKx*yVxvb}zh+ɴD,"tٮ~ep`qާ`6~l>Ccd2LQ]F"*J~*s
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/XObject 84 0 R
/Font 85 0 R
>>
endobj
43 0 obj
<<
/Length 86 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
44 0 obj
<<
/Length 87 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.00 0.00 0.00 792.00 0.00 0.00 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im56 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F57 12.37 Tf
100 Tz
73.68 713.52 TD
(for the purposes of the Beacon Fund Distributions and they often result in substantial profits) Tj
/F57 12.21 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(being earned overall.) Tj
/F57 12.78 Tf
36.96 -27.60 TD
(17. As a result of the interaction of these various factors, it is my estimation based) Tj
/F57 12.30 Tf
-36.96 -27.60 TD
(on the numbers I have seen that many, if not all, of the long term investors already have made) Tj
/F57 12.32 Tf
-1.68 -27.60 TD
(profits on their Beacon Fund investments and for most, they will get further distributions, and) Tj
/F58 5.00 Tf
1.20 -27.60 TD
(profits, even if ) Tj
75.84 0.00 TD
(the distribution of ) Tj
/F57 12.35 Tf
91.44 -.24 TD
(Beacon Madoffmoney is made under the Net Equity) Tj
/F58 5.00 Tf
-167.28 -27.36 TD
(Method. They wil also receive further distributions of ) Tj
/F57 5.00 Tf
274.32 -.24 TD
(Non-Madoff ) Tj
/F57 12.13 Tf
65.04 -.24 TD
(money which we believe) Tj
/F57 12.45 Tf
-339.12 -27.12 TD
(should continue to be made on the basis of the Valuation Method. The use of the) Tj
/F57 12.28 Tf
-.48 -27.60 TD
(hybrid/blended approach does give the older investors a substantial benefit from the profits) Tj
/F57 12.38 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(which they rightly made on the Non-Madoffmoney.) Tj
/F58 8.69 Tf
36.96 -27.60 TD
(18. To take Income Plus as an example, Mr. Jeanneret informs the Court that, by) Tj
/F59 11.18 Tf
-37.20 -27.60 TD
(using the Net Investment Method versus the Valuation Method, Income Plus would receive) Tj
/F58 5.00 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(nearly $700,000 from the current distribution and $2.2 million less if ) Tj
342.48 -.48 TD
(the full amount of ) Tj
/F57 11.79 Tf
90.96 -.48 TD
(the) Tj
/F57 12.25 Tf
-433.44 -26.64 TD
(BLMIS claim is ultimately paid and the Net Investment Method is used to compute Beacon) Tj
/F58 5.00 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Fund distributions than it would receive if ) Tj
/F57 12.21 Tf
210.24 -.24 TD
(the Valuation Method were used across the board.) Tj
/F59 10.73 Tf
-210.24 -27.36 TD
(Jeanneret Decl. ii 11,12,14.) Tj
/F57 12.78 Tf
36.72 -27.60 TD
(19. Mr. Jeannerett fails to advise the Court that Income Plus' investors received) Tj
/F57 12.36 Tf
-36.96 -27.60 TD
(milions of dollars in profits from the distribution in the BONY settlement. Those payments) Tj
/F57 12.26 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(will not reduce future distributions from the Beacon Funds.) Tj
/F58 5.00 Tf
36.24 -27.60 TD
(20. Similarly, Mr. Jeanneret cites the "extreme example" of ) Tj
/F57 12.13 Tf
316.32 -.72 TD
(the investor who will) Tj
/F58 5.00 Tf
-352.80 -26.88 TD
(receive nothing if ) Tj
/F57 12.25 Tf
90.24 -.24 TD
(the BLMIS recovery is distributed on the Net Investment Method and over) Tj
/F57 12.35 Tf
-90.00 -28.32 TD
($2 million if the Valuation Method is used. However he fails to mention that the investor in) Tj
/F57 12.25 Tf
-.24 -26.88 TD
(question already made a profit on the Beacon investments.) Tj
/F57 9.12 Tf
230.40 -40.80 TD
(8) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<<
/Length 88 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x%ȹ0}ŖP5c:*\Fr
ߘsԱ4Z]X1Xah*$ u
endstream
endobj
46 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/XObject 89 0 R
/Font 90 0 R
>>
endobj
47 0 obj
<<
/Length 91 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
48 0 obj
<<
/Length 92 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
611.28 0.00 0.00 792.00 0.00 0.00 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im63 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F64 8.11 Tf
100 Tz
108.96 713.28 TD
(21. It is difficult, perhaps impossible, for the Court to ascertain with any certainty) Tj
/F65 12.27 Tf
-36.24 -27.60 TD
(whether the profit which investors will make if the blended hybrid approach is used is) Tj
/F65 12.28 Tf
0.48 -27.60 TD
(somewhat lower than the theoretically perfectly calculated "net asset value" devised to) Tj
-.48 -27.60 TD
(eliminate all of the fictitious Madoff profits, or possibly even higher than the theoretical) Tj
/F65 12.40 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(perfectly calculated non-Madoff "profit." What is absolutely certain, however, is that) Tj
/F65 12.24 Tf
0.24 -27.60 TD
(imposition of the Valuation Method on the distribution of Madoff money will create the) Tj
/F65 12.27 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(inequity of having some investors realize the benefit of fictitious profits at the direct expense) Tj
/F65 12.22 Tf
0.00 -27.60 TD
(of other investors.) Tj
/F64 8.87 Tf
35.52 -27.60 TD
(22. To use the Valuation Method under these facts, would be to have some) Tj
/F65 12.27 Tf
-35.76 -27.60 TD
(investors obtain fictitious profits at the expense of newer investors, or to have some investors) Tj
/F64 5.00 Tf
-.24 -27.60 TD
(who are still "net losers" recover a proportionately greater share of ) Tj
/F65 12.33 Tf
331.92 -.96 TD
(their loss as the expense of) Tj
/F65 12.40 Tf
-332.16 -26.64 TD
(newer investors. Fastenberg seeks to avoid that iniquitous result.) Tj
/F65 11.91 Tf
35.76 -27.60 TD
(I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoi) Tj
/F65 11.85 Tf
-35.76 -27.60 TD
(Executed, in New York, New York,) Tj
/F66 10.44 Tf
0.48 -13.92 TD
(September 5, 2014.) Tj
/F65 10.08 Tf
228.24 -276.00 TD
(9) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
49 0 obj
<<
/Length 93 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x%Ȼ@~Z;,, B0"X5b0ώ_A%Et(lٮ~%ZkC6~l>CɤcKzν)ʺKP-tnW:Uw
endstream
endobj
50 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/XObject 94 0 R
/Font 95 0 R
>>
endobj
51 0 obj
10
endobj
52 0 obj
2371
endobj
53 0 obj
122
endobj
54 0 obj
<<
/Im7 96 0 R
>>
endobj
55 0 obj
<<
/F10 97 0 R
/F9 98 0 R
/F8 99 0 R
/Xi0 100 0 R
>>
endobj
56 0 obj
10
endobj
57 0 obj
3278
endobj
58 0 obj
121
endobj
59 0 obj
<<
/Im14 101 0 R
>>
endobj
60 0 obj
<<
/F15 102 0 R
/Xi1 100 0 R
/F16 103 0 R
/F17 104 0 R
>>
endobj
61 0 obj
10
endobj
62 0 obj
2994
endobj
63 0 obj
121
endobj
64 0 obj
<<
/Im21 105 0 R
>>
endobj
65 0 obj
<<
/F22 106 0 R
/F23 107 0 R
/F24 108 0 R
/Xi2 100 0 R
>>
endobj
66 0 obj
10
endobj
67 0 obj
3293
endobj
68 0 obj
120
endobj
69 0 obj
<<
/Im28 109 0 R
>>
endobj
70 0 obj
<<
/F31 110 0 R
/F30 111 0 R
/F29 112 0 R
/Xi3 100 0 R
>>
endobj
71 0 obj
10
endobj
72 0 obj
2940
endobj
73 0 obj
121
endobj
74 0 obj
<<
/Im35 113 0 R
>>
endobj
75 0 obj
<<
/F38 114 0 R
/F37 115 0 R
/F36 116 0 R
/Xi4 100 0 R
>>
endobj
76 0 obj
10
endobj
77 0 obj
2768
endobj
78 0 obj
121
endobj
79 0 obj
<<
/Im42 117 0 R
>>
endobj
80 0 obj
<<
/F45 118 0 R
/Xi5 100 0 R
/F44 119 0 R
/F43 120 0 R
>>
endobj
81 0 obj
10
endobj
82 0 obj
3396
endobj
83 0 obj
120
endobj
84 0 obj
<<
/Im49 121 0 R
>>
endobj
85 0 obj
<<
/F51 122 0 R
/F50 123 0 R
/Xi6 100 0 R
/F52 124 0 R
>>
endobj
86 0 obj
10
endobj
87 0 obj
3144
endobj
88 0 obj
121
endobj
89 0 obj
<<
/Im56 125 0 R
>>
endobj
90 0 obj
<<
/F59 126 0 R
/F58 127 0 R
/F57 128 0 R
/Xi7 100 0 R
>>
endobj
91 0 obj
10
endobj
92 0 obj
1823
endobj
93 0 obj
121
endobj
94 0 obj
<<
/Im63 129 0 R
>>
endobj
95 0 obj
<<
/Xi8 100 0 R
/F64 130 0 R
/F66 131 0 R
/F65 132 0 R
>>
endobj
96 0 obj
<<
/eCpyDPIY 300
/eCpyDPIX 300
/DecodeParms 133 0 R
/Type /XObject
/Subtype /Image
/Name /Im7
/BitsPerComponent 1
/Width 2550
/Length 134 0 R
/Height 3300
/Decode [0 1]
/ImageMask true
/eCpyColor [0 0 0]
/Filter /CCITTFaxDecode
>>
stream
X+Q ;@=-ԙgf˙ P&J+"+q"B]U2:7|82DoMӴN5>cmK$
hfc30|@ ?'
/҅Z/iExB l/F7NjH&߫T'ZZoPˉ_=-6(_ii_RAGP{҈V\?DxXAo0]kh{ݐkomoSk_o'_m>3>aL%ozm;[kiJzv!ArҦlIL` @x!QM} AaAp@M5(Aڈ_]xK A6"KĤwX庐e3..sX.CDXf
0`4:`ᰈ`0 Ih `0$
"}h4DdYAH@ȾjKK A,==Pw|IA;@4~KvKUn~zo[o_>[%jﯴߙ=z^5,V[KW Z[?^;EM/KU[am:'/MUK~kU֕[_ӭJ]/m/q0_ ~_/oEȑHr$ 7[Mr,dWEwف_ۧޟ =q߿}ok_[jO}mկ-~-w_o۶K]wmo뿯+kl߯ۅޖ߮_a%_!oavªa$0`顦6IMIx
4CBPDp0An6bb`Fc#.d!SP+:?PՂd#PΤfVCqe ș]#i.e%RK&[CpZKZM_Ւ?}J_SKT%K^N
{U\-Qvd'F
t3g!N\ZuSl@<P034AAajqC0ˌg:Y
&AvIa'h6:_EؑV 2
p=0¨E0Z uT='"Iu4
*N@ZIit`ҡh,Rz]izZ4RJ].{JKt[vJ[KKiRiUz_ZoZZ;ֵ-Wu$ҭ$RT%uIzCM*WJk%Xҥj+_+B_u\RҤIiihW^_ZBo^WIiU%]oA!I~KjV%ZIt_KAWZA*/.a/[J_*z%Ai7UPUV . *Zi]}i"b(Tz&3&6(^]/6JVK]:־z_L_I~V뤾K_ץu
^Oi.'ҠE=t0Z RU.뤼ҏKPiSiz/Ka.XKR]--&J| $ ja}zZ:ӭl$%Մ:]6UVIOCXb mMC&¦uUi\.Itɭ(LUSL*+ AL&
jT
*¨qgڴ!0B!qI$7 zYRUgd.ZZM-&VSd8?M"]LTD0 8,..2$U&m=i&Mhф+[}_Ui_[khs#!DNש0aaCb j4,"pDE0$]
r0O[XAA W mzw)^îuB+A_[z^p[KD;].IނV].t?zzz6zOΚZak[\$" A8IVLS1 !
dvpU F 2PL.""""""=/JZ
ֵeE_Y6@iUTnD'yN`
MPA n{V<~?Bk>CGX0^0㯮tt$d?oniut{}/_z]/GE_[t]+UҴ&4ath0bqgb?,jYFz,D%(s4
JB)l 0X6 ,6`
D@l4h;M0 MT]
ç%i7:[-m/kuKui]%wY"/|EjD D%<%A!oCb o@!vp´p*|-h0@´p*]mۤaH6ﶨ _!mޝRlSz ߦ&KTaI<--ou['%Ͻp]دkK ~o+T~?ntKk}r.һ߷OUw߽o+KLKod5߷woc/}{ڴ?Jүm.ޟ
^ٙo>VتmjHфJ$mڻ^$MkiBU \0
6)QLBtsO2qaDD0(BJ[fBe9'(DF$0@dg(f&tL*
-o/aSm/IKK=RmRm&sp!utm-*յW}7ת=on)Pu
WK[uۨ_^~]
^uMץ-'ZZpOBDKK/]}k/[t֫n_UuGECZ] u[Vф&ҺuKm+^k\VlPbҫ CN^m(m+h(aX;Ba33;8'adႄv
?-ީ>:4ym\֓i5_̡k_Z_?]&5E"2!Ι3ό0|'2lI`=h>""y!SbiȄ Bl]$a;Em@
&+i7Me^'v;v'x1+7'`Z_Jv߅Ol6*I}?ºi%zK_Z+iHzc?$>_wc_Z_ީAmK?!Ktnk/_i_}_ja/o^, }k!)V*˪iڰJiiO!]5G0080@A@l
G a
\)7IK.yn"."saՄDDDDDDDDDDE!eIYC]-\5K31Qx X0@,Y
ږN25.Geq)nN
A˂l6!`C-9Ӑq!H!Fp!G,t!G0 93. d'04N$Nݢ`WA<0,,D0ah4
ddT2ttA3t^ :B md2;o@OT[TMItI0Nzo:M{~uo~?Oǽ']o]{}ǽ~݇{T^K~[~߷0{K0o__J?~L׆'No7~oPᾰM}~u?.߇oA: tc[w)[_^7KK܈"?[t_w+._]ڷN^ַZZ^i6}p~ 8i&
XaA6iwv$4(0ic0$0!!'l$!!0 &[7 `AN@0B*xA*P@bb$)'"`ML0写N(``rj``u[
yBp9p?ep\8˅: !39 Nt
o<
@@jfl`fhE!C`"CXR
5!}iÐ!ì 3A8m*s@| `"adiNpȶ0'L'̓$x62D aE0dX`
mN a
AꝄ7A: pN$ a
on+M߷MZm&}}'ᆵ[{i$_W{qƯ|oU.{}}7Uoqjw~/[oa?zNo$--u
kKKo~[iCڤw\%#տ^AEao7/=7j}=&+3N}MooNNO416?~6Æoo7U'MܷS>=
z1mo}m~"k]S{Һһ_}Zo
'_Kx[}&Ҵ]i{ὤM=ASm^K
$Ն mZՆI$&` al8LlCb& V0lmb@6!D
a aM
f0laLDG-VQe>Hιy.@/rۯ t_?嶦-?->}G[jWQdps0VBFfD#hPD"02ˁNj&D`r`:r0B%ĄACRP0J p0A
r%X2/H"s]ht
_2a'`A@p`'8DaXAAaҤAH6OKw;
H: v :AutH?߫I
'IMpպմOH?ꓤ:uoWJIջ=tc;OuwxV;KKw;w=ta~n_ZZC߽t=7}Cj_oaCPjKWޗ
_Z{_O߶k_%`l>˰V3b-_~8v~#aƿ_+l0oM:-67:(7z
7o
O7
oxзwWпwxoN>IBs?io>[Wm_M辰Obֲ?ntn{Ւ_Vu;dniUZNWmCu:L4~ni%Z[^L4+-m,N ki6v4i6m-tiZxK^IMB`&A[[ 6L$`҆U /a+UM 0V A1@q
(1A@0!Q@lP !4A7$ Mڕ0"
PLBMb"%; PqЗ[jW`6B2Dh̸HPElfEW"2656! *f @A/j!\a
ZPd%XeXS9( `@'c,0\"`#%DB84Oa^5"p0Xa%]4:8Aai8&Nzi;MaA^ Dkddh 'Imޝ'VA0kAta'A6Mm}ڽ:NK{5][IoI_j_4WcO6=7V'[[Wz0KnNҺ3Qw0o}tKƕض+_{uz[v6+
^XWaե߶u_}'ޟҧ[e]}a-|l?_aa
V߷\BJml?3_oXa?'Km8oa
~n[?_Ӱ
(l7Aw?{^BC'c#_xmo>6{
ʄ~t#'vV}7:voz})Z}v߿#+ȏתuޮr#i7___OMt/մunմVNtZV]VtK-.KJ[K>gauxiCIl%酴[
iv鄛A>iCH6-Pa&E LpM;4axDa8piCI ;TP]BsPbA aw "BBb piw;Bb"`WA0@+?`H"2 HNxvK\8)\wq)ץ$ AD|ԯ>YXR: aF"qB!@Bp !6p@SyB.FS5JSp`
uHfl.O3JPX8d3B&0XDevBta @>B@тD7as3,i2S"sa&L8d/ ph s$EEA"s
eЋ\0$Al2lԉ(˂aI1FH8o
@A =-8v'j;v H0݄v0/ A@m&{VtI-OAUNA;k[M6ӤO߶oN[om'ֿt}oi^ޓN_tO_Vۯ'2{inסo[JN5o ч;}Z~$oۦ/woW߫FjݥvҺnc_:.?_\_?^om,!*a<}//-k_]7Omi[l?kKI`6?`JjMaj6|mx[K9(mOD4oK+{5uo_7k{lJWM]:ì8woaծb$J~зo?U^]g?IiKקo§C$=/Ѵe VpZ^_տۯII=*InŶۺWf}}$uGb_I鬌[BCI%VNn^WZW_ץBMw7ZOjֻߤFq_Z]Nk~VhIZ
'Ꞛ}Oݥj II]U-{[M*[L0V0L%`IuBL0J?l%K< &`
0@qAP `
3`1AaWB0Z
itҤMІ
IԮ
AiJ0H>aB@"B]h 'B""FaP#B
B#С<:n"ck6'ҮKYo@T.Er8)x^9q!25S7[j^ld!@n("gGQMDr:dL3qsNq2HD @Б%b5;/0
A060@ޚ:A
; 8LtAAtAtMT۽:Iݭ'=jO{'ںM}JZovj>~Vg}ƻ-+a5jOaZ~?Kl?}?_mVXi~ݯ0?W_7wUSCa}÷_Bl;aPGS}>o)S^WmZD}?_db-]'_uj:Z_iF}.JKV+KnZL4}xk
&4[a%[ ]UiCI&)4 0Ia
0gq
xAa9U( j
/0B0A"""x44"KqBD+nnU [I
f*mg`4QLgLP@$Jd
YHl(arsDe+9D !E`(H#BV
6J6ȧaEG;Xd_
dpaa"<Ot2/$vlO ?mo,~]ޓ{zI:[&imWϯ}?Zn=vc>ߺ~i~?{ozޯw{z,.kmxAE-o /_uM=+<_"Go_,5E~k~ߙ}_}-?KOM}}~r1t_[XK[[Uoz׆nݭal.];xJ¶¯--6L!)
a4ݶnKc0 `h@ lCa0M0 #
qVr3zm00$DDDDDbN#嶥ͫ*yeC8f ahhrFp`SPerd!h0ô@yMHZ C2rX!C!*qa`*#p0w=!0"j"Agh0a{zo
6;wU]-AoG[?K{A_=;_J-/두Lf0G2A{g;3_L
K.$.^=tN(Tdh&s_^ jR0Zj2>[VK~..{]uq?۽~/ko&+?mXr#oV}Eէ,|7+{{AI3ZIRI]o4鴟okk_kK]w}ݤ7i>k퐎Mi4ӆߥimw 0h )7o4*݅WÈD0B Ρ !I顦8 n( hap@A%|`DDym|ȬBqvM?s8GdD
CM$xm嶥ڗ?嶥ڗY:">h)u 1
a.+cu23PGIhYH0ZxnADZB~^Pi^*$a-/Կ-/mK-/&DR)܉qD@ɁNEA#l3Ȍr3:-9" Ԃ Q
4p 9e8fD jQ9w?EAeAe$!ϡ>D`*'cE~D`Y<#23/%P`Dx0[3P.ddAmZAMh:A
H8tڞd 0r\p &Nto7{Nޖ iN
Um_^[ҿ_ki>i?ju{_t{UK*W}7~7BNnazMÿz0zao0w?whz?KߦQo]+vICI?!^?ץ5ⷥZ龝{ztׯ]UZWuw_KZz};
_°o[[^o{zml=[KKo}|/oo(a##Uo
L~W&ӷ
7mOZ_O&}6տ~ޗ_t?@L}^{u�ov?{]rBl;ۭ>8nnoKo#}o~T&ZoWoWj_{_t[NK_}Obv}#k_6ߥu~7z-'m'Ko4-aJ-]aKo ٙmI]n҆l$ *+m4ﶓivӠ`PlPa ; HKA 1 0
0"]7L iM02-vx"
d$& 6@ A19T) a S:!7@1ZA7b6 t9`#-A$̍0B""&JH0R2C xuץ]mK
;̩ԛXP<D!lud=\.@3&!B
q$.
ϑ!P@w3;/w0aoo^[Wy^
IuoQU֊?aoF^oﬣ4v_ܝl8a[KJɵս
7om6~!o}vm{v>pgޯOmތ_qOW^7O߿_o>v/~1~k~S?$ڵ}#ҿ[okRlMzKj:MimM֭Mn 6uiZM_]z[BFIizi]aںVi6ޚ}}i4UmaXj&5խ 0m;N eǂ6 *!(1@#A`E
a\G020O0$`~8i1 v=%Jă-8}A$7Dtna 6DDDDDDDDDDDDHDDDDDwDG#.+嶥ɲ2`sB>'dc8ddO"2'227ߖ@\"2B!p092" 9#
eᖈzQ4TB
$4
r$"J2/C,D02QdRurx0d~!2aÆ2Xdd6Hh
aTt?4m =w p'8dh4
Pd0L7H&AwۦNݺwmn}nݭWI_/_7VIo_K7zl}[?V߽~0k{~aޯWp;w0~i]__ߊ
kc^C[NoҾׯ߷^]aտ_{u{u_߿i}~d-^=>m{~i~Wy:a~
{u&oo&}>_~{Kuoۯ}}n?|{z㴿omv_
Q{BcרGCUu~_F]z_n+}N}߆?lW"?i_ֽ.Vm+k_K{KݭzA%%$imjI0xITxU"aNM3 &CM=P3& &f[t\n(
p<
C
)@p@ Blpo#&~L,X!e0Ó8d'``g)| Ϛ^DWҪC PQm~Z
,S8͑u@͢$98Bp0r4L$
k(xˑT")258Llc6 n q6(|HVX2G2~Dd|2dA'dx4
"/2 E2A"t~ AziA7Tx[m>$[tatNoモoAm{'}&='
:ko|{Wwﮕww0.a?0]?_Kn?_}v>[k
dBoW}~K{úWalM,AQ?7ف3&=|{|q- ol>o8$/'y(Xa{?'7Ѡ'}TQoyxoo뿇7o_o[x~ߩ\mo
9!?'o'O{M_ն^Slwo_ս)wݯo֗KKmK{z]Z_y<'KwﮗAmn|%Om(iz+%Ui&TҰa-;iX]004XIm]BTAH A!!l0+@v !!A !4APAL Avh`aO`ZA7b `4!@""""""S""""CB"$"it$A. xUmuM␈wgf2GN2QW0d2>[0`2ˆsAϩC-() (aP92Ȩ,3DDC`\a0`%yAʉp'6/ASZ'cP00ai';%%aAmA0a09yNtuI2hNaYUNa턃mݷN
ۺNڶa^an[7}?ֵgC;{?7zI~ݺ}ǿ{ZK>{x8,{V/_;wNt/|1^gBrB}^7p\K/ߥ_mKkk {{nu%
?
/o[7{
/'Og_>O~p~ݼ7iɎ>?{7[xo[_{c?~o~:|Gĉzތ"G~oݾuNǚ~CƾSmzo+|_ޓo[oĝ{߯VWl߶oVtmkmL7[鴷}^t]imwzAi}{m>6[TnՆm-iX]}]
mL.+ LDj4ؠ$L$<*a4nNia)Jb#B
Aa byBb!`lB0A` |930.K`pas9s(2ȗRNJ@"""""""""""""""""#-~[9 !C A
"*9 `pe AlHvlEq5a2?O06
%H2\D,@÷i
pAozݿoIׯ
֚OUﶗO_76]oV^}0?I!\hۿz^]ok_/*[|tؖlL '^q-~mɿOwMaìtHgQz}mz}}n[1߷0
>:oZWF-oUmk:k^AW[w^3u -}+-=KnJ *
nL'B a9
!AH4A 7@DDDDDDDDD4Y\